Many faggots like to be exposed by others. But that is illegal if the exposer can’t prove consent. That was one of the reasons why Fagspose was created.
When Fagspose started in 2023, the biggest risk (and excitement) was to be found by your real name. But in 2025 face recognition became even a bigger threat. This is keeping many fags from following their desire to get completely exposed. The risks for work and family are just too high.
So being fagsposed is just for the very few that embrace all the risks. They only get excited from the fear of being completely ruined.
A bit less risk is created with Fagspose Light, where the fag uses a nickname. But still the face will be clearly exposed.
Fag Register (FagReg.com)
During one of my conversations with a fag struggling to get fagsposed or not, the idea came to create a register. A register for faggots that want to be exposed, but just have enough functional brain cells left to not get fagsposed (yet…).
These fags are active on exposing sites that are not well indexed by search engines and Telegram groups. But on many of those sites it is impossible to see if the fag is exposing himself or is exposed with consent by an other person. Doxxing is a serious risk.
By adding a FagReg-id to your photos, videos and posts you can prove your consent to exposure.
Don’t need this. I have a PEA!
Public Exposure Agreements are just too easy to falsify. The Fag Register can be used to authenticate your PEA and all your other content.
What should be in the Fag Register?
Now it is up to you fags!
What should be in the Fag Register? How should it look like?
Share your ideas and discuss in the comments below!
I think so, it s need every fag.
I need it, a number just we are a number.
A fag just a mouth, hole and number. So it s a good idea thankyou sír!
This sounds like a great idea to get started exposing oursleves on fagspose without going the whole way all at once. Is it operational yet or when will it start?
Have you determined the fees?
It is still in the stage of thinking about how it should look like.
I think this is a good idea Sir Fagspose.
Would it be possible to keep fag id pages non-public (that is not only not indexing them for search engines, but for example giving them a random site address so they can not be found on your main fagspose site)
This would even further lower the entry barrier for fags to use this, and make that first step easier. Creating the fag id is very low risk, but then if they want to expose themselves they can reference that site, so the exposure can be validated as voluntary. But only then.
In my view it would also be very justified to charge for creating such a fag id, so that your effort is properly covered.
This is a very good point you make. How public should the information of the Fag Register be.
I like to hear what others think. For those who feel completely free to expose themselves, there is already Fagspose. They don’t need a Fag Register.
What do you think?
thank you for considering 🙂
Due to the lower risk, a much larger number of fags might want to take this first step. This is also why I think it needs to come with some cost, otherwise it would not scale for you I guess
A small fee will have to be charged. The fags can thank the Fag-Tax fags for making the Fag Register possible. Their regular payments will cover most of the costs for this project.
thanks to the Fax-Tax Fags then 🙂
one other variant, alternatively to hiding the Fag-Register fags (until they hand out the link to their Fag-Registration), the Fag-Register could show them with face obscured, with the uncensored version hidden (hope I am making sense).
That way all visitors of fagspose could still see how many Fag-Registered Fags there are, and get a first impression, but still it stays low risk and below the Fag Light exposure
The registration list would need to be published and available for public verification; if not, it would be no different than all the other various Public Exposure Agreements you can find online.
Yes. The idea is that the visibility of the regestration is depending on the fag being exposed elsewhere So getting the registration as a first step does not expose yet, but then showing your picture e.g. in telegram allows people to validate that its genuine.
Maybe an example how this could be done works best (Sir Fagspose, this is not a suggestion how to do it, just an example to better explain)
1. Fag gets a Fag registration with requisite information provided to Sir Fagspose, and a number of pictures similar to other fagspose content. This is however NOT put visibly on the fagspose site. The fag gets a reg-id
2. Fag posts one of his exposure pictures e.g. in a Telegram channel. That picture has the reg-id as a watermark
3. Anyone who sees that picture can go to the fagspose site, enter the reg-id and then sees the content, and knows that the fag has agreed with the exposure
This sounds like it would be exactly my speed to start!
I would combine some of the great ideas here:
1 ID know by Sir
2 add a statement of registration with first name and city published
3 clause on either 1. Pay additional fee to stay registered or 2. Publish on light variant by a certain date
For beginners a great idea I think. Not as heavy as fagpose or even the light version.
Sir Fagspose has created so many amazing options for us fags! I look forward to falling down this rabbit hole to my ruin!
I am interested in registering at fag register just like participating in Fagspose. But I don’t see how we can not be found on Google as a difference to Fagspose
It is possible to tell Google not to index a website and its content. It works really well on closed networks, like social media websites for naturists. But no 100% guarantee of course that all search engines will respect that. And a difference will be that Fag-Register will be visible for people who are not a member of the site. It will have to be a public register. (At least, that is what I think).
For Fagspose I use a lot of so called SEO tricks to get indexed. I won’t bother you with the details. On Fag-Register I would not apply those tricks.
Face recognition will be even more dangerous in the future. On Fag-Register you will be allowed to use a nickname. But your face has to be real or (partially) covered.
Okay
Thank you for the explanation Sir
being searchable on google would be a (scary) kick for me. But I don’t wanna be identified by my real name. I took a relatively unique nickname (not really by intension) and thus there are some search hits. Not really a load of pics atm, thanks god.
Since I restarted activities, i check google almost daily for new embarassment.
In your case Fagspose Light might be what you are looking for.
maybe I wait for some other fags to do light and look at the results first.
Special for beginners is a nice idea to start the journey of expose. Perhabs Email verification would help. Like the Visitcard at Gmail.
Fags will indeed to verify their email, but also their identity. Because without proof of identity I am not allowed to post your adult content.
Great Idea!
My initial thoughts: Sir Fagspose provides a service and site similar to the Fag-Tax setup. Have a registration form with fee structure for the application and video verification process. Suggest issuing FR #s (Fag-Registration) with a printout form similar to, yet distinct from the Fagspose, Light and Fag-Tax printouts the men display.
I would also keep a spreadsheet on the Fag-Reg page of all men that complete the process like you have for the Fagspose gents. On the FR verification form add a statement that the registration is recorded on the Fag-Reg website. This will have an added benefit of potential visitor traffic to the Fagspose family of websites.
Should a photo holding the Fag-Reg sign should be included on site? If so, I can’t decide if the photo must be full frontal nude with face visible or if a photo from the shoulders down is acceptable. I’d make it a requirement to be nude in the photo for consistency across the Fagpose platform, but would accept holding the verification sign over the genitalia for those more modest.
Sounds like a good thing. I suppose you want a proof of ID, otherwise maybe it makes no sense. Maybe IDs can partly be grayed out. And then some watermark sign on every pic?
Yes. Proof of ID will be mandatory, because otherwise I will not be allowed to post any fag’s content.
I don’t publish IDs at all. People will have to trust me on that I checked the IDs. And I think the reputation Fagspose already has, should be enough.
It would indeed be a good idea to add a watermark consisting of a logo and id number to any content.
Adding a URL in the watermark is not accepted by many websites.